United States v. Garcia-Perez

51 F. App'x 676
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2002·No. No. 02-10195; D.C. No. CR-01-00276-LRH·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Alberto Garcia-Perez appeals his conviction and 65-month sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court deprived him of due process by imposing a sentence greater than Section 1326(a)’s two-year maximum based on Garcia-Perez’s prior aggravated felony, where he did not admit to having previously committed an aggravated felony.

Garcia-Perez states that he presents the issue merely to preserve it in the event of ensuing favorable Supreme Court precedent, and acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001).

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garcia-Perez, 51 F. App'x 676 (9th Cir. 2002).

51 F. App'x 676 (United States v. Garcia-Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia-Perez, AKA Ontiveros-Silva v. United States
538 U.S. 954 (Supreme Court, 2003)