United States v. Garcia-Perez
This text of 32 F. App'x 477 (United States v. Garcia-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Roberto Garcia-Perez appeals his conviction and 121-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Garcia-Perez contends that, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), § 841 [478]*478is unconstitutional on its face and therefore his conviction and sentence must be vacated. This contention is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc) (concluding that § 841 is not facially unconstitutional).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 F. App'x 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-garcia-perez-ca9-2002.