United States v. Galloway

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Galloway. Read the opinion of the Court — 382 F. App'x 294
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2011·No. 11-6145·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6145

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ANTONIO GALLOWAY, a/k/a Yoda,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:06-cr-00309-WO-1)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Antonio Galloway, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Antonio Galloway appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Galloway, No. 1:06-cr-00309-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Galloway, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Galloway (United States v. Galloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related