United States v. Fullerton Construction Company
This text of 407 F.2d 1339 (United States v. Fullerton Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
407 F.2d 1339
The UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of
Thomas D. SLIGH and M. L. Shaw, Partners, d/b/a
Sligh Plumbing & Heating Company,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FULLERTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Continental Casualty
Company, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 12885.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1969.
Michael H. Quinn, Columbia, S.C. (Fulmer, Barnes, Berry & Austin, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants.
Edgar L. Morris, Columbia, S. C., for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the opinion of the district judge. D.C., 296 F.Supp. 518.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F.2d 1339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fullerton-construction-company-ca4-1969.