United States v. Fuller

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fuller

470 F. App'x 152

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fuller. Read the opinion of the Court — 404 F. App'x 713 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2012·No. No. 11-7625·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Daryl Andre Fuller appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fuller, No. 7:98-cr-00076-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[153]*153tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Daryl Andre Fuller appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fuller, No. 7:98-cr-00076-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[153]*153tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Fuller, 470 F. App'x 152 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

470 F. App'x 152 (United States v. Fuller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related