United States v. Fuell

23 F. App'x 173
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 9, 2002·No. No. 01-7672·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Jerome Fuell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000), and motion to dismiss the indict[174] ment under Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fuell, No. CR-93-138 (E.D.Va. Sept. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fuell, 23 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2002).

23 F. App'x 173 (United States v. Fuell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuell v. United States
536 U.S. 932 (Supreme Court, 2002)