United States v. Frias-Pina
This text of 252 F. App'x 582 (United States v. Frias-Pina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gabriel Frias-Pina (Frias) appeals his 60-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. For the first time on appeal, Frias argues that the district court committed error by enhancing his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his prior Texas conviction for aggravated robbery. Our review is limited to plain error. United States v. Gonzalez-Chavez, 432 F.3d 334, 336 (5th Cir.2005).
Under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), a defendant’s base offense level is increased by 16 levels if he was previously deported after a conviction of a crime of violence. Robbery is an enumerated crime of violence in the application notes to § 2L1.2, comment. (n.l(B)(iii)). Frias has not shown plain error in the increase of his offense level based on his prior aggravated robbery conviction. See United States v. Santiestebartr-Hemandez, 469 F.3d 376, 378, 381 (5th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 F. App'x 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frias-pina-ca5-2007.