United States v. Freeman
This text of 474 F. App'x 180 (United States v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[181]*181Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Donte Cheron Freeman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Freeman, No. 4:06-cr-00016-JLK-1, 2012 WL 178354 (W.D.Va. Jan. 23, 2012); see United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 235-36 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Freeman’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-freeman-ca4-2012.