United States v. Fredis Reyes-Contreras

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fredis Reyes-Contreras. Read the opinion of the Court — 910 F.3d 169
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2018·No. 16-41218·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 16-41218 June 15, 2018 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff − Appellee v.

FREDIS ALBERTO REYES-CONTRERAS, also known as Alberto Contreras-Romero, Defendant − Appellant

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas __________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion February 6, 2018, 5 Cir., 2018, 882 F.3d 113)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fredis Reyes-Contreras, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Fredis Reyes-Contreras (United States v. Fredis Reyes-Contreras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Fredis Reyes-Contreras
882 F.3d 113 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)