United States v. Frazier-El

46 F. App'x 168
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2002·No. 02-7025·Unpublished

Opinion

*169 PER CURIAM.

Clinton Bernard Frazier-El seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Frazier-El has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. United States v. Frazier-El, Nos. CR-96-469-WMN; CA-01-3412-HNM (D. Md. June 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Frazier-El, 46 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2002).

46 F. App'x 168 (United States v. Frazier-El) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related