United States v. Franklin

311 F. App'x 702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Franklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 561 F.3d 398
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2009·No. 08-30406·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Edwin L. Franklin appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of making fraudulent claims for Hurricane Katrina-related disaster relief to the Fed *703 eral Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and with making false representations to FEMA in connection with the fraudulent claims. Franklin argues that the district court erred by denying him a two-level downward adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 based on acceptance of responsibility.

The district court denied the downward adjustment due to Franklin’s repeated use of drugs while awaiting sentencing. The district court’s determination that Franklin’s drug use was inconsistent with the acceptance of responsibility is not without foundation. See United States v. Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2452, 171 L.Ed.2d 248 (2008); United States v. Watkins, 911 F.2d 983, 984-85 (5th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Franklin, 311 F. App'x 702 (5th Cir. 2009).

311 F. App'x 702 (United States v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Kenneth Ray Watkins
911 F.2d 983 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Juarez-Duarte
513 F.3d 204 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Mathis v. United States
128 S. Ct. 2453 (Supreme Court, 2008)