United States v. Francisco Reza

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 21, 2018
• Docket: 18-6780
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6780

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FRANCISCO REZA, a/k/a Frankie, a/k/a Pancho,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cr-00185-LMB-1)

Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francisco Reza, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Francisco Reza appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for

sentence reduction. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reza,

No. 1:14-cr-00185-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. June 19, 2018). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although a district court lacks authority to reconsider its ruling on an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), “this prohibition [is] non-jurisdictional, and thus waived when the government fail[s] to assert it below,” United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 252 (2017).