United States v. Francisco Nolasco

901 F.2d 799, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6575
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Francisco Nolasco. Read the opinion of the Court — 926 F.2d 869
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1990·No. 88-1156·Published

Opinion

901 F.2d 799

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Francisco NOLASCO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-1156.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 25, 1990.

Prior report: 881 F.2d 678.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Francisco Nolasco, 901 F.2d 799, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6575 (9th Cir. 1990).

901 F.2d 799 (United States v. Francisco Nolasco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Francisco Nolasco
881 F.2d 678 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)