United States v. Francisco Nolasco
This text of 901 F.2d 799 (United States v. Francisco Nolasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
901 F.2d 799
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Francisco NOLASCO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-1156.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
April 25, 1990.
Prior report: 881 F.2d 678.
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
901 F.2d 799, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francisco-nolasco-ca9-1990.