United States v. Francisco Madrigal
This text of 699 F. App'x 322 (United States v. Francisco Madrigal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Francisco Madrigal pleaded guilty of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marihuana. His advisory guideline range was 120 months of imprisonment, which was the statutory minimum. The district court departed downward and imposed a term of 90 months. Madrigal challenges the denial of. his motion for a reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.
Here, however, the district court lacked authority to reduce Madrigal’s sentence because Madrigal’s advisory guideline range was governed by the statutory minimum. See United States v. Carter, 595 F.3d 575, 578-81 (5th Cir. 2010); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(B)(vii); U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(a), p.s. & comment. (n.l(A)). Because Madrigal was not eligible for a reduction, the court was not authorized to grant him one.
The judgment of sentence is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francisco-madrigal-ca5-2017.