United States v. Francisco Garcia-Manzo
This text of 383 F. App'x 660 (United States v. Francisco Garcia-Manzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Francisco Javier Garcia-Manzo appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Garcia-Manzo contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to ad *661 dress his policy challenge to the enhancements that apply under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). The record reflects that the district court responded to Garcia-Manzo’s argument and therefore did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
Garcia-Manzo also contends that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), should be overruled. As Garcia-Manzo recognizes, this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1197 (9th Cir.2009) (recognizing that although the continuing viability of Almendarez-Torres has been called into question, this court is bound to follow controlling Supreme Court precedent).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 F. App'x 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francisco-garcia-manzo-ca9-2010.