United States v. Fox

583 F.3d 596, 2009 WL 3019813
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2009·No. 08-30445·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

583 F.3d 596 (2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John Michael FOX, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-30445.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 16, 2009.

Stephan Alexander Collins, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, Kirby A. Heller, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John Michael Fox, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Mary C. Geddes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Kevin Francis McCoy, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fox, 583 F.3d 596, 2009 WL 3019813 (9th Cir. 2009).

583 F.3d 596 (United States v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Fox
631 F.3d 1128 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Dillon v. United States
560 U.S. 817 (Supreme Court, 2010)