United States v. Fordham

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 2009
Docket08-7044
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Fordham (United States v. Fordham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fordham, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO ORLANDO FORDHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00548-CMC-14)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Orlando Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antonio Orlando Fordham appeals the district court’s

order denying his pro se motion for a sentence reduction

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Fordham, No. 3:05-cr-00548-CMC-14 (D.S.C. May 30, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Fordham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fordham-ca4-2009.