United States v. Fordham
This text of United States v. Fordham (United States v. Fordham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7044
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO ORLANDO FORDHAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00548-CMC-14)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Orlando Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Antonio Orlando Fordham appeals the district court’s
order denying his pro se motion for a sentence reduction
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Fordham, No. 3:05-cr-00548-CMC-14 (D.S.C. May 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Fordham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fordham-ca4-2009.