United States v. Ford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ford. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 F.3d 54
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 9, 1996·No. 95-11026·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-11026 Summary Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRENDA LEE FORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-016-A-1 - - - - - - - - - - August 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Brenda Lee Ford appeals her conviction for conspiracy to

possess and distribute cocaine and possession with intent to

distribute. Her sole argument on appeal is that the evidence was

insufficient to support her conviction and is limited to the

conspiracy conviction. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs of the parties and hold that the evidence was sufficient

for a reasonable jury to find Ford guilty beyond a reasonable

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-11026 -2-

doubt. United States v. Charroux, 3 F.3d 827, 830-31 (5th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ford, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Ford (United States v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related