United States v. Ford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ford. Read the opinion of the Court — 288 F. App'x 54
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 2009·No. 08-7144·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7144

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LEMONZE E. FORD,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (7:03-cr-01094-HFF-14)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemonze E. Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lemonze E. Ford appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Ford, No. 7:03-cr-

01094-HFF-14 (D.S.C. filed June 13, 2008, entered

June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ford, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Ford (United States v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related