United States v. Fonseca

497 F.2d 1384
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 9, 1974
DocketNo. 78-2875
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 497 F.2d 1384 (United States v. Fonseca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fonseca, 497 F.2d 1384 (5th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Prior opinion 490 F.2d 464.)

Before COLEMAN, AINSWORTH and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:.

In view of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dorsynski v. United States, - U.S. -, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 40 L.Ed.2d - (1974) relative to the sentencing requirements to be met by the district court under subsection 5010(d) of the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5005, et seq., petitioner Fonseca’s petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that the matter is remanded for resentencing under the guidelines of Dorsynski. In all other respects the petition is denied.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James
528 F.2d 999 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Hamilton
391 F. Supp. 1090 (W.D. Missouri, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
497 F.2d 1384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fonseca-ca5-1974.