United States v. Fogg

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8066

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN FOGG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00030-JRS-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 8, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Fogg, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Fogg appeals the district court’s orders denying

his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and subsequent motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Fogg, No. 3:05-cr-00030-JRS-1 (E.D.

Va. June 10, 2008 & July 14, 2008). We deny Fogg’s motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED