United States v. Flores

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 F.3d 385
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 24, 1997·No. 96-21065·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21065 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISRAEL FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-221-3 - - - - - - - - - - October 17, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Israel Flores was convicted of conspiracy to commit wire

fraud, mail fraud, use of a fictitious name, and money laundering

and aiding and abetting mail and wire fraud. He argues that the

district court erred in calculating his offense level by

referring to the money-laundering guideline and erred in finding

that the loss amount attributable to him was $244,341.60.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-21065 - 2 -

The district court did not erred in calculating his offense

level by referring to the money-laundering guideline, U.S.S.G.

§ 2S1.1, because, of the related offenses of conviction, it

carried the highest offense level. See § 3D1.3(a). The district

court also did not err in relying upon the $244,341.60 loss

amount calculated in the presentence report. United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc);

U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Flores, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Flores (United States v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Calverley
37 F.3d 160 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)