United States v. Flores

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 368 F. App'x 424
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2009·No. 08-7286·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWIN FLORES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00292-JCC-5)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Flores, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edwin Flores appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Flores, No. 1:06-cr-

00292-JCC-5 (E.D. Va. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Flores, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Flores (United States v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related