United States v. Flint

1 M.J. 428, 1976 CMA LEXIS 7713
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 4, 1976·No. No. 30,915·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed. In affirming, we adopt the development and analysis of that court in resolving the speedy trial question,1 except insofar as the court exempted all rehearings, rather than merely Dubay-type proceedings2 from the [429] Burton3 rule. A DuBay proceeding, in effect, is utilized to gather additional evidence or to resolve conflicting evidence before determining an issue presented to the appellate tribunal. A rehearing, on the other hand, is a trial de novo, to redetermine either an accused’s guilt or an appropriate sentence or both. As such, rehearings necessarily fall within the Burton mandate, and such rehearings must be held within 90 days of the date the convening authority is notified of the final decision authorizing a rehearing. Inasmuch as the offenses involved in this case all predated the Burton decision, the rule has no applicability in this instance.

Judge COOK and Judge PERRY concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Flint, 1 M.J. 428, 1976 CMA LEXIS 7713 (cma 1976).

1 M.J. 428 (United States v. Flint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bess
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2020
Loving v. United States
64 M.J. 132 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2006)
United States v. Becker
53 M.J. 229 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
United States v. Howard
35 M.J. 763 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1992)
United States v. Moreno
24 M.J. 752 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1987)
United States v. McFarlin
24 M.J. 631 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1987)
United States v. Giles
20 M.J. 937 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1985)
Hollywood v. Yost
20 M.J. 785 (U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review, 1985)
United States v. Roberts
18 M.J. 192 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1984)
United States v. Vonkageler
18 M.J. 642 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1984)
United States v. Usry
9 M.J. 701 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1980)
United States v. Cabatic
7 M.J. 438 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Frederick
7 M.J. 791 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1979)
United States v. Roman
5 M.J. 385 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
United States v. Johnson
5 M.J. 658 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1978)
United States v. Kelker
4 M.J. 323 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
United States v. Martin
4 M.J. 852 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1978)
United States v. Baughcum
4 M.J. 536 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1977)
United States v. Crooks
4 M.J. 563 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1977)
United States v. Taylor
3 M.J. 947 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1977)