United States v. Fletcher

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1655

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

and

HANCOCK BANK,

Garnishee,

v.

WAYNE ALLEN FLETCHER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:02-cv-00493-H)

Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Allen Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wayne Allen Fletcher appeals a district court order

denying his motion filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and find the court did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion. See Werner v. Carbo, 731 F.2d 204, 206 (4th Cir.

1984) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED