United States v. Fletcher
This text of 333 F. App'x 719 (United States v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Wayne Allen Fletcher appeals a district court order denying his motion filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Werner v. Carbo, 731 F.2d 204, 206 (4th Cir.1984) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F. App'x 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fletcher-ca4-2009.