United States v. Fleck

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fleck. Read the opinion of the Court — 397 F. App'x 871
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 13, 2010·No. 10-6618·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6618

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANNY LEE FLECK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00491-AMD-1)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 13, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Lee Fleck, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Mason Gruber, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Danny Lee Fleck appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Fleck, No. 1:04-cr-00491-AMD-1 (D. Md. Feb. 18 & Mar. 23, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fleck, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Fleck (United States v. Fleck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.