United States v. Fleck
This text of United States v. Fleck (United States v. Fleck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6618
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANNY LEE FLECK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00491-AMD-1)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 13, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Lee Fleck, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Mason Gruber, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Danny Lee Fleck appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Fleck, No. 1:04-cr-00491-AMD-1 (D. Md. Feb. 18 & Mar. 23, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Fleck, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fleck-ca4-2010.