United States v. First National City Bank

Supreme Court

United States v. First National City Bank

377 U.S. 951, 84 S. Ct. 1629, 12 L. Ed. 2d 496, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1155

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 1, 1964

Docket998

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 377 U.S. 951 (United States v. First National City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. First National City Bank, 377 U.S. 951, 84 S. Ct. 1629, 12 L. Ed. 2d 496, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1155 (1964).

Pincite

Opinion

377 U.S. 951

84 S.Ct. 1629

12 L.Ed.2d 496

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.

No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI