United States v. First National City Bank

377 U.S. 951, 84 S. Ct. 1629, 12 L. Ed. 2d 496, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1155
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1964·No. 998·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

377 U.S. 951

84 S.Ct. 1629

12 L.Ed.2d 496

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.

No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. First National City Bank, 377 U.S. 951, 84 S. Ct. 1629, 12 L. Ed. 2d 496, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1155 (1964).

377 U.S. 951 (United States v. First National City Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ray Roya
574 F.2d 386 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Arthur Lee Johnson
504 F.2d 622 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
NAACP, Western Region v. Brennan
360 F. Supp. 1006 (District of Columbia, 1973)
United States v. Henry Stahl
393 F.2d 101 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Riley Wells
387 F.2d 807 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)
Wall v. Stanly County Board of Education
259 F. Supp. 238 (M.D. North Carolina, 1966)