United States v. Feurtado

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2010·No. 09-7949·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7949

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY FEURTADO, a/k/a Anthony Greene, a/k/a Ginzo, a/k/a Gap, a/k/a Pretty Tony, a/k/a Tony Feurtado, a/k/a Anthony Lamar Brown, a/k/a Anthony Paul,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00325-SB-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 3, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Feurtado, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Feurtado appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Feurtado, No. 3:96-cr-

00325-SB-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Feurtado, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Feurtado (United States v. Feurtado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related