United States v. Ferrer-Castaneda
161 F. App'x 341
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 9, 2005·No. No. 05-51004·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Ferrer-Castaneda raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ferrer-Castaneda, 161 F. App'x 341 (5th Cir. 2005).
161 F. App'x 341 (United States v. Ferrer-Castaneda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodruff v. United States of America
District of Columbia, 2020
Dianne Sledge v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
D.C. Circuit, 2014
Walding v. United States
955 F. Supp. 2d 759 (W.D. Texas, 2013)
Sledge v. United States Bureau of Prisons
District of Columbia, 2010
Castro v. United States
581 F.3d 275 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)