United States v. Felix
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6411
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM FELIX, a/k/a Willio Mode,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:93-cr-00140-WLO-PTS-2)
Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: July 1, 2010
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Felix, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Felix appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Felix, No. 6:93-cr-00140-WLO-PTS-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2010; Apr.
26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Felix (United States v. Felix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.