United States v. Felix

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Felix. Read the opinion of the Court — 386 F. App'x 356
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2010·No. 10-6411·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6411

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM FELIX, a/k/a Willio Mode,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:93-cr-00140-WLO-PTS-2)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: July 1, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Felix, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Felix appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Felix, No. 6:93-cr-00140-WLO-PTS-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2010; Apr.

26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Felix, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Felix (United States v. Felix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related