United States v. Feliciano Albiter-Miranda

692 F. App'x 776
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 11, 2017
Docket16-50139 Summary Calendar
StatusUnpublished

This text of 692 F. App'x 776 (United States v. Feliciano Albiter-Miranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Feliciano Albiter-Miranda, 692 F. App'x 776 (5th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Feliciano Albiter-Miranda, federal prisoner # 57748-180, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Albiter-Miranda pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute at least 500 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. He seeks to challenge the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion in which he sought a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Albiter-Miranda’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. See United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011); United States v. Contreras, 820 F.3d 773, 774-75 (5th Cir. 2016). The appeal is not taken in good faith because it lacks arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Albiter-Miranda’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied.

The facts surrounding the IFP decision are inextricably intertwined with the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 *777 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Henderson
636 F.3d 713 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
Howard v. King
707 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Christopher Covey v. Assessor of Ohio County
777 F.3d 186 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Rick Contreras
820 F.3d 773 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 F. App'x 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-feliciano-albiter-miranda-ca5-2017.