United States v. Faulkner

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 15, 2010·No. 097675·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7675

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARNELL ALLEN FAULKNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:03- cr-00460-AMD-1)

Submitted: March 2, 2010 Decided: March 15, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darnell Allen Faulkner, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darnell Allen Faulkner appeals the district court’s

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Faulkner, No. 1:03-cr-

00460-AMD-1 (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Faulkner, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Faulkner (United States v. Faulkner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related