Home/Fourth Circuit/United States v. Faisal Hashime

United States v. Faisal Hashime

722 F.3d 572, 2013 WL 2466835, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11645
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2013
Docket12-5039R1
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 722 F.3d 572 (United States v. Faisal Hashime) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Faisal Hashime, 722 F.3d 572, 2013 WL 2466835, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11645 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinions

ORDER

Appellant filed a petition for hearing en banc which was circulated to the full Court. No judge requested a poll under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; therefore, the petition for hearing en banc is denied. Judge Gregory wrote an opinion concurring in the denial of hearing en banc, in which Judge Davis joined.

Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Traxler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garland
Fourth Circuit, 2022
United States v. James Cobler
748 F.3d 570 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)
Cobra Natural Resources, LLC v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review
Fourth Circuit, 2014
Cobra Natural Resources, LLC v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
742 F.3d 82 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Faisal Hashime
734 F.3d 278 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 F.3d 572, 2013 WL 2466835, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-faisal-hashime-ca4-2013.