United States v. Fabian Vaksman

471 F. App'x 674
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fabian Vaksman. Read the opinion of the Court — 472 F. App'x 447
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2012·No. 11-30240·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Fabian Vaksman appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for dental services. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Vaksman seeks an order requiring the United States Marshals Service to pay for dental services for him. In light of Vaksman’s subsequent transfer to Bureau of Prisons’ custody, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631, 99 S.Ct. 1379, 59 L.Ed.2d 642 (1979) (once a party is shown to lack a “legally cognizable interest in the outcome” of the adversary proceeding, the action is moot).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fabian Vaksman, 471 F. App'x 674 (9th Cir. 2012).

471 F. App'x 674 (United States v. Fabian Vaksman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Los Angeles v. Davis
440 U.S. 625 (Supreme Court, 1979)