United States v. Fabian Vaksman

471 F. App'x 674
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 2012
Docket11-30240
StatusUnpublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 674 (United States v. Fabian Vaksman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fabian Vaksman, 471 F. App'x 674 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Fabian Vaksman appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for dental services. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Vaksman seeks an order requiring the United States Marshals Service to pay for dental services for him. In light of Vaksman’s subsequent transfer to Bureau of Prisons’ custody, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631, 99 S.Ct. 1379, 59 L.Ed.2d 642 (1979) (once a party is shown to lack a “legally cognizable interest in the outcome” of the adversary proceeding, the action is moot).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County of Los Angeles v. Davis
440 U.S. 625 (Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F. App'x 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fabian-vaksman-ca9-2012.