United States v. Fabian-Chavez
This text of 163 F. App'x 608 (United States v. Fabian-Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[609]*609MEMORANDUM
Jose Guadalupe Fabian-Chavez appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Fabian-Chavez contends that the district court erred by granting only a five-level downward departure and denying his request for additional downward departures. Fabian-Chavez was sentenced before the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Although a defendant may not challenge on appeal the extent of a downward departure under the pre-Booker mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, see United States v. Riggins, 40 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.1994), we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory. Accordingly, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional Booker error).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 F. App'x 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fabian-chavez-ca9-2006.