United States v. Ezequiel Campuzano-Martinez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2015
Docket15-40134
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ezequiel Campuzano-Martinez (United States v. Ezequiel Campuzano-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ezequiel Campuzano-Martinez, (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Case: 15-40134 Document: 00513242989 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40134 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 22, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EZEQUIEL CAMPUZANO-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14-CR-1455-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ezequiel Campuzano-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Campuzano-Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 15-40134 Document: 00513242989 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015

No. 15-40134

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ezequiel Campuzano-Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ezequiel-campuzano-martinez-ca5-2015.