United States v. Evans

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Evans

323 F. App'x 381

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 2009

DocketNo. 08-10703

StatusPublished

This text of 323 F. App'x 381 (United States v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Evans, 323 F. App'x 381 (5th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent James Evans, III, has moved for leave to [382]*382withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Evans has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Evans’s response discloses no nonfriv-olous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Evans’s motion for appointment of . counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be [382]*382published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent James Evans, III, has moved for leave to [382]*382withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Evans has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Evans’s response discloses no nonfriv-olous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Evans’s motion for appointment of . counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be [382]*382published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

323 F. App'x 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-evans-ca5-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack