United States v. Evans
This text of 474 F. App'x 289 (United States v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tiayon Kardell Evans appeals the district court’s order denying a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Evans’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Evans has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-evans-ca4-2012.