United States v. Evans

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Evans. Read the opinion of the Court — 526 F.3d 155
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2008·No. 08-8064·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8064

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VERDELL EVANS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:02-cr-00612-MBS-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Verdell Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Verdell Evans appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Evans’ motion for transcripts at

government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Evans, No. 6:02-cr-00612-MBS-1

(D.S.C. filed July 17, 2008; entered July 18, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Evans, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Evans (United States v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related