United States v. Evans
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6662
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD JOURDAN EVANS, a/k/a Freak, a/k/a Man- Man,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-92-163-N)
Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Jourdan Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for reduction of sentence. Upon reviewing the record for
abuse of discretion we find that there was no abuse of discretion.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Evans, No. CR-92-163-N (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Evans (United States v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.