United States v. Evans
This text of United States v. Evans (United States v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6910
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HENRY EVANS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-83-107-2)
Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert James Wagner, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Evans, CR-83-107-2 (E.D. Va. May 20, 1993; May 23, 1995). The mo-
tion to withdraw as counsel of record filed by Appellant's counsel
is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Evans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-evans-ca4-1996.