United States v. Estupinan
187 F. App'x 914
This text of 187 F. App'x 914 (United States v. Estupinan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Estupinan, 187 F. App'x 914 (11th Cir. 2006).
Opinion
Luis Miguel Porto-Carrero Estupinan, pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(c), and/or 3742(a). Because Estupinan’s sentence was final when he filed his motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 F. App'x 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-estupinan-ca11-2006.