United States v. Estupinan
187 F. App'x 914
Opinion
Luis Miguel Porto-Carrero Estupinan, pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(c), and/or 3742(a). Because Estupinan’s sentence was final when he filed his motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Estupinan, 187 F. App'x 914 (11th Cir. 2006).
187 F. App'x 914 (United States v. Estupinan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)