United States v. Escobar

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Escobar. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 F. App'x 935
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2005·No. 03-51357·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 11, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51357 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO ANTONIO ESCOBAR, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-97-CR-1002-1-DB --------------------

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Roberto Antonio Escobar,

Sr., has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Our independent review

of the record, counsel’s brief, and Escobar’s responses shows

that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The record is

insufficiently developed to allow consideration on direct appeal

of Escobar’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See

United States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir. 1998).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-51357 -2-

Accordingly, without prejudice to Escobar’s right to file a

motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Escobar, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Escobar (United States v. Escobar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Carlos Ray Brewster, Jr.
137 F.3d 853 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)