United States v. Escobar
This text of 140 F. App'x 560 (United States v. Escobar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The attorney appointed to represent Roberto Antonio Escobar, Sr., has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Escobar’s responses shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration on direct appeal of Escobar’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See United States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir.1998). Accordingly, without prejudice to Escobar’s right to file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 F. App'x 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-escobar-ca5-2005.