Home/D.C. Circuit/United States v. Errol Zeiger

United States v. Errol Zeiger

475 F.2d 1280, 155 U.S. App. D.C. 11
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 1972
Docket72-2065
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 475 F.2d 1280 (United States v. Errol Zeiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Errol Zeiger, 475 F.2d 1280, 155 U.S. App. D.C. 11 (D.C. Cir. 1972).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on for consideration of an appeal under 23 D.C.Code § 104(d) from an order of the District Court, 350 F.Supp. 685, dated November 7, 1972, which admitted proffered polygraph testimony, and the Court heard argument of counsel.

On consideration of the foregoing, and of the record on appeal herein, it is

Ordered by the Court that the order of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby reversed and this case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Walker
2018 MT 312 (Montana Supreme Court, 2018)
Leonard, William Thomas
385 S.W.3d 570 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)
State v. AO
965 A.2d 152 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2009)
Commonwealth v. Mendes
547 N.E.2d 35 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1989)
Jones v. State
716 S.W.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
United States v. John W. Downing
753 F.2d 1224 (Third Circuit, 1985)
People v. Anderson
637 P.2d 354 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1981)
United States v. Grant
473 F. Supp. 720 (D. South Carolina, 1979)
State v. Catanese
368 So. 2d 975 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1979)
Lhost v. State
271 N.W.2d 121 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1978)
Reed v. State
391 A.2d 364 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1978)
State v. Pleasant
583 P.2d 680 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1978)
Cullin v. State
565 P.2d 445 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1977)
State v. Conner
241 N.W.2d 447 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1976)
United States v. Steven John Alexander
526 F.2d 161 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
State v. Swanson
225 N.W.2d 283 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. Woo
527 P.2d 271 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
Commonwealth v. a Juvenile
313 N.E.2d 120 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1974)
Romero v. State
493 S.W.2d 206 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 F.2d 1280, 155 U.S. App. D.C. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-errol-zeiger-cadc-1972.