United States v. Ernest Marshall

976 F.2d 658, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28368, 1992 WL 292530

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: November 3, 1992
• Docket: 91-8141
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity. United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d 51, 53 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.- 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991); United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir.1990); United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir.1990).

We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal.

AFFIRMED.