United States v. Eric Miller

366 F. App'x 717
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2010
Docket09-1506
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 F. App'x 717 (United States v. Eric Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eric Miller, 366 F. App'x 717 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eric Miller, who is serving a 188-month prison sentence imposed in 2007 after he pleaded guilty to a crack cocaine offense, see United States v. Miller, 256 Fed.Appx. 894, 894-95 (8th Cir.2007) (per curiam), appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence. Miller’s motion was based upon an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, which retroactively lowered the base offense level for crack cocaine offenses. The district court denied his motion after a hearing, reasoning in part that the retroactive amendment did not lower the Guide *718 lines sentencing range for Miller because he had been sentenced as a career offender. Upon careful review, we agree with the district court. See United States v. Thomas, 524 F.3d 889, 889-90 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (although Sentencing Commission lowered offense levels related to crack cocaine quantities, it did not lower the sentencing range for career offenders under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. United States
178 L. Ed. 2d 183 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 F. App'x 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eric-miller-ca8-2010.