United States v. Eric Fields

543 F. App'x 322
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2013
Docket13-4346
StatusUnpublished

This text of 543 F. App'x 322 (United States v. Eric Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eric Fields, 543 F. App'x 322 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Andre Fields appeals the district court’s pretrial detention order in his criminal case. The issue of pretrial detention is moot after a conviction. See Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 481-82, 102 S.Ct. 1181, 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982) (finding, in civil action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief related to denial of pretrial bail, that civil plaintiffs “claim to pretrial bail was moot once he was convicted”). Because Fields was convicted long before this appeal was docketed, we lack jurisdiction to address his challenge to his pretrial detention.

Fields also moves, pro se, for release pending the resolution of his appeal of the underlying criminal judgment, pending in No. 12-4724. A defendant seeking release pending appeal must first move for such relief in the district court. See United States v. Hochevar, 214 F.3d 342, 343-44 (2d Cir.2000) (citing Fed. R.App. P. 9); 4th Cir. R. 9(b). Because Fields has not moved in the district court for release pending appeal, we deny the motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny Fields’ motion for release pending appeal, without prejudice to his ability to file such a motion in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Hunt
455 U.S. 478 (Supreme Court, 1982)
United States v. Gene Anthony Hochevar
214 F.3d 342 (Second Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eric-fields-ca4-2013.